Deepinfo vs. Group-IB.
Group-IB carries deep CTI expertise built from years of incident-response work in the Russian and CIS region. The trade-offs are jurisdictional complexity in some procurement frameworks and a CTI-heavy product line where adjacent capabilities feel bolted on. Deepinfo is jurisdictionally clean, modular by design, and integrates CTI signal across the platform alongside EASM, BRP, and TPRM.
Jurisdictional clarity plus integrated platform.
Group-IB's CTI heritage is real. The company built its reputation on incident-response work in Russia and the CIS region, with strong adversary-tracking expertise in that geography. The trade-offs that come with that heritage matter for some procurement frameworks: jurisdictional complexity, licensing structure, and the perception of regional-stack association.
Deepinfo is headquartered in Türkiye with offices in Paris and Kuwait. Customer data is primarily stored in US-based infrastructure with EU and regional options on request. The platform integrates CTI as one module alongside EASM, BRP, and TPRM rather than treating threat intel as the lead with everything else as adjacent. For procurement frameworks that flag Russian/CIS-origin tooling, Deepinfo is the cleaner option.
Four places Deepinfo extends beyond CTI-heavy origin.
Jurisdictional clarity.
Deepinfo is incorporated under Dofo Teknoloji Anonim Şirketi, headquartered in Türkiye, with primary infrastructure in US-based regions, plus EU and regional options on request. No Russian/CIS jurisdictional ties. For defense, government, financial-services, and other procurement frameworks that flag origin, the difference is procedural and concrete.
Modular by design, CTI as one of four.
Group-IB's architecture is CTI-led with adjacent capabilities layered on. Deepinfo is modular: External Attack Surface Management, Cyber Threat Intelligence, Brand Risk Protection, and Third-Party Risk Management as integrated modules sharing one dataset. CTI is one of four integrated capabilities, not the lead with adjacent bolt-ons.
Internet-scale dataset Deepinfo owns end-to-end.
Group-IB's CTI is anchored to their incident-response casework plus partner data. Deepinfo indexes the internet itself: 400M+ domains, 2B+ subdomains, 200B+ DNS records, 30B+ SSL certificates, plus the full CVE corpus enriched with EPSS and CISA KEV. Same dataset under our control with our own cadence.
Direct dataset access via Data Feeds and APIs.
Deepinfo exposes the dataset as Data Feeds and APIs that engineering teams build with directly. Group-IB is consumed primarily through their portal and managed services; raw dataset access for in-house tooling isn't the offering.
Group-IB's regional CTI depth is real.
For organizations whose primary threat-intelligence concern is Russian-speaking adversary groups operating in CIS-region infrastructure, Group-IB's historical depth in that geography is genuine. The casework, the analyst expertise, and the regional reporting are the products of years of operational presence.
For organizations that need jurisdictional clarity in their procurement framework, want a modular platform where CTI is one of four integrated capabilities, or value dataset independence over managed-service consumption, Deepinfo is the cleaner option.
Where Deepinfo serves jurisdiction-sensitive deployments.
A defense manufacturer
Procurement framework requires jurisdictional clarity on every tool in the stack. Deepinfo's headquartering and infrastructure regions match the framework cleanly.
Read the storyA public-safety agency
Sovereign-data sensitivity requires explicit residency commitments and an incorporation jurisdiction the agency can defend in audit.
Read the storyA municipal government
Constituent-facing surface monitoring under public-sector procurement framework, with integrated CTI signal as one platform module rather than a managed service.
Read the storyOther comparisons.
Deepinfo vs. Recorded Future.
Recorded Future is a heavyweight in pure-play CTI.
Compare COMPAREDeepinfo vs. Mandiant.
Mandiant is the IR consulting standard, with deep incident-response expertise built into a platform-plus-services model.
Compare COMPAREDeepinfo vs. ZeroFox.
ZeroFox leads with Brand Risk Protection and digital-risk monitoring, with strong coverage on social media and surface-web brand abuse.
CompareSee an integrated platform under jurisdictional clarity.
The free threat exposure report runs Deepinfo against your domain and emails the result within 24 hours. EASM, CTI, BRP, and TPRM as integrated modules, all under a procurement-friendly jurisdiction.