Deepinfo vs. Recorded Future.
Recorded Future is a heavyweight in pure-play CTI. The trade-off is that you stitch their threat intelligence into your own attack surface picture. Deepinfo runs CTI as one module of a unified platform that already knows your external surface, so the intelligence is correlated with your assets out of the box.
What Deepinfo does that Recorded Future doesn't.
Recorded Future delivers excellent threat intelligence as a feed and a query interface. Deepinfo delivers threat intelligence already correlated with your external attack surface, your brand-impersonation infrastructure, and your third-party portfolio, because all four run on the same platform sharing the same indexed dataset.
If you only need CTI and you already have separate systems for ASM, brand defense, and TPRM, Recorded Future stays standalone in your stack. If you want intelligence that arrives already tied to your assets, your domains, and your vendors, Deepinfo replaces the stitching layer you'd otherwise build.
Four places Deepinfo goes beyond CTI alone.
Threat intel correlated with your own surface, automatically.
Recorded Future surfaces an IOC; you decide whether it touches your environment. Deepinfo already knows your external surface, so a newly observed adversary domain that resolves to your IP space, hosts a fake of your brand, or sits inside your third-party portfolio surfaces as a finding tied to a specific asset. The correlation isn't your job.
EASM, BRP, and TPRM in the same platform.
Recorded Future is CTI. Deepinfo is CTI plus External Attack Surface Management, plus Brand Risk Protection (lookalike domains, brand abuse, takedowns), plus Third-Party Risk Management. The same dataset feeds all four; cross-module correlation is built in. With Recorded Future you buy CTI and integrate the rest yourself.
Internet-scale data Deepinfo owns end-to-end.
Recorded Future is an aggregator and analyst layer over many third-party sources. Deepinfo indexes the internet itself: 400M+ domains, 2B+ subdomains, 200B+ DNS records, 30B+ SSL certificates, plus the full CVE corpus enriched with EPSS and CISA KEV. Same dataset under our control; the freshness, cadence, and historical depth are all ours.
Direct dataset access, not just analyst reports.
Deepinfo exposes the underlying dataset as Data Feeds and APIs your engineering team can build with directly. Bulk feeds for analytical workloads, real-time streams for low-latency workflows, queryable APIs for operational integration. Recorded Future is consumed primarily through their portal and curated feeds; building on the raw data isn't the offering.
Recorded Future is good at what they're built for.
Recorded Future has scale, analyst depth, and a long history of pure-play CTI. If your shop is structured around a CTI team that consumes intelligence as a primary product, that already operates an ASM and brand-protection stack from other vendors, and that wants the most decorated CTI portal in the category, Recorded Future delivers.
But for a security organization that wants threat intelligence already woven into the external surface picture, with EASM and brand defense and third-party monitoring sharing the same engine, that's the seam Deepinfo is built to close.
Where Deepinfo delivers the unified picture.
A major bank
CTI signal correlated with brand-impersonation monitoring across the bank's customer-facing domains. The intelligence and the takedown workflow live in one platform.
Read the storyA cybersecurity ratings provider
An organization running Deepinfo as the data backbone behind its own customer-facing service. The depth and freshness of the dataset is the product.
Read the storyA defense manufacturer
Threat-actor intelligence tied directly to attack-surface findings across a sensitive supply chain. Cross-module correlation is the operational requirement.
Read the storyOther comparisons.
Deepinfo vs. Mandiant.
Mandiant is the IR consulting standard, with deep incident-response expertise built into a platform-plus-services model.
Compare COMPAREDeepinfo vs. ZeroFox.
ZeroFox leads with Brand Risk Protection and digital-risk monitoring, with strong coverage on social media and surface-web brand abuse.
Compare COMPAREDeepinfo vs. Group-IB.
Group-IB carries deep CTI expertise built from years of incident-response work in the Russian and CIS region.
CompareSee the unified picture on your own surface.
The free threat exposure report runs Deepinfo against your domain and emails the result within 24 hours. CTI signal correlated with your assets, your brand-impersonation surface, and your vendor portfolio. The integrated picture, on real data.