Deepinfo vs. ZeroFox.
ZeroFox leads with Brand Risk Protection and digital-risk monitoring, with strong coverage on social media and surface-web brand abuse. Deepinfo provides Brand Risk Protection as one module of an integrated platform plus the underlying internet-scale dataset that powers detection across EASM, CTI, and TPRM as well.
Brand defense plus the surface that makes it work.
ZeroFox does brand defense, lookalike-domain detection, social-media monitoring, takedowns. The model is monitoring layered over publicly observable signals.
Deepinfo does brand defense the same way, plus owns the underlying dataset that powers detection. The same internet-scale corpus drives EASM, CTI, and TPRM in the same platform. For organizations that want brand defense plus the broader external-exposure picture under one engine, the architectural difference is meaningful.
Four places Deepinfo extends beyond brand-defense alone.
Internet-scale dataset Deepinfo owns end-to-end.
ZeroFox monitors public surfaces. Deepinfo indexes the internet itself: 400M+ domains, 2B+ subdomains, 200B+ DNS records, 30B+ SSL certificates, plus the full CVE corpus enriched with EPSS and CISA KEV. The dataset is ours end-to-end; brand-defense detections benefit from depth that licensed data can't provide.
Integrated EASM, CTI, and TPRM.
ZeroFox is BRP-focused with adjacent threat-intel coverage. Deepinfo is BRP plus External Attack Surface Management plus Cyber Threat Intelligence plus Third-Party Risk Management, all in one platform. Cross-module correlation, a brand-impersonation domain tied to a specific threat actor, a vendor exposure tied to lookalike infrastructure, is built in.
Eight confusable match types for lookalike detection.
Deepinfo's lookalike-domain detection runs eight confusable match types including homoglyph variants that simple typo-detection misses. The detection engine is anchored to the same indexed domain corpus that drives discovery; the depth of the underlying data improves the precision of the match.
Direct dataset access via Data Feeds and APIs.
Deepinfo exposes the dataset as Data Feeds and APIs that engineering teams can build with directly. ZeroFox is consumed primarily through their portal; raw dataset access for in-house tooling isn't the architecture.
ZeroFox's social-media coverage is real.
ZeroFox's social-media monitoring depth is genuine, long-standing relationships with major platforms, established takedown workflows, and category-specific operational expertise. For organizations whose primary brand-defense concern is impersonation across social media, ZeroFox's focus pays off.
For organizations that want brand defense plus the broader external-exposure picture, with EASM and CTI sharing the same dataset, Deepinfo is the more integrated option.
Where Deepinfo runs brand defense plus the surface.
A major bank
Lookalike-domain detection and brand defense correlated with the bank's external-asset surface and CTI signal, all in one platform.
Read the storyAn e-commerce platform
Brand-impersonation monitoring across the customer journey, tied to the asset surface and threat-actor intelligence. The full picture, not just the social-media slice.
Read the storyA regulated pharmaceutical company
Brand-defense workflows correlated with regulated-industry exposure monitoring, threat-actor tracking, and supply-chain visibility.
Read the storyOther comparisons.
Deepinfo vs. Recorded Future.
Recorded Future is a heavyweight in pure-play CTI.
Compare COMPAREDeepinfo vs. Mandiant.
Mandiant is the IR consulting standard, with deep incident-response expertise built into a platform-plus-services model.
Compare COMPAREDeepinfo vs. Group-IB.
Group-IB carries deep CTI expertise built from years of incident-response work in the Russian and CIS region.
CompareSee brand defense plus the surface around it.
The free threat exposure report runs Deepinfo against your domain and emails the result within 24 hours. Lookalike-domain detection, brand-impersonation surface, and the broader external picture in one platform.